ANALISIS TINGKAT KOGNITIF PADA ITEM TES MEMBACA BERDASARKAN KURIKULUM 2013 DAN KURIKULUM MERDEKA

Authors

  • Alpha Yerni Safitri Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat Author
  • Rika Afriyanti Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat Author
  • Melvina Universitas PGRI Sumatera Barat Author

Keywords:

2013 Curriculum, Merdeka Curriculum, Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS), Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy, Reading skills

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the cognitive levels of reading test items based on the 2013 Curriculum and the Merdeka Curriculum, with a particular focus on Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS). This research employed a qualitative descriptive method with document analysis as the main approach. The data were obtained from the final semester examination of grade XII students, consisting of 47 reading test items from the 2013 Curriculum (academic year 2022/2023) and 37 reading test items from the Merdeka Curriculum (academic year 2024/2025). The analysis was conducted using the Revised Bloom’s Taxonomy framework, which classifies cognitive levels into C1–C3 (Lower Order Thinking Skills/LOTS) and C4–C6 (HOTS: analyzing, evaluating, and creating). The findings reveal that the 2013 Curriculum contains 14 HOTS items (12 analyzing and 2 evaluating), while the Merdeka Curriculum contains 13 HOTS items (10 analyzing and 3 evaluating). These results indicate that both curricula integrate HOTS in reading assessments, although with different distributions. Despite their relatively limited proportion, the presence of HOTS items reflects the curricula’s attention to developing students’ critical, analytical, and evaluative thinking skills. Therefore, it is suggested that teachers enhance both the quality and quantity of HOTS-based questions to better prepare students for the demands of 21st-century learning.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afifatul Mahfuzah, & Jufri. (2019). Students' abilities to answer reading questions with HOTS and the mistakes made by students in answering those questions. Journal of Education Research, 3(2), 45–56.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman.

Ercikan, K., McCreith, T., & Lapointe, V. (2011). Relationships between affective characteristics and cognitive performance: Testing structural equation models. Educational Assessment, 16(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2011.551087

Fanani, A. (2018). Developing students’ higher order thinking skills (HOTS) in reading: A case study in Indonesian senior high school. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v8i1.11459

Hassan, S. R., & Rosli, R. (2016). A model of higher order thinking skills for teaching mathematics in Malaysia. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 6(11), 92–106. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v6-i11/2392

Hikmah, H. (2020). The effectiveness of HOTS English module in the English teaching and learning process. Journal of English Language Teaching, 9(1), 35–44.

Marizka, A. (2020). Teachers’ ability in constructing HOTS questions for English learning assessment. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 20(1), 76–87.

Machali, I. (2013). The 2013 curriculum: Opportunities and challenges. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 2(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.14421/jpi.2013.21.1-11

Muthoharoh, N. (2023). Implementation of Merdeka curriculum: Flexibility in learning and character building. Indonesian Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology Studies, 11(2), 101–110.

Retnawati, H., Jailani, Sugiman, Bukhori, E., Apino, E., & Djidu, H. (2018). Teachers’ knowledge about higher-order thinking skills and its learning strategy. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 76(2), 215–230. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/18.76.215

Rejeki, S. (2021). Students’ higher order thinking skills in answering reading comprehension questions. Journal of English Education and Teaching, 5(2), 233–242.

Siregar, S. G. (2021). Types of reading comprehension questions in English tests. Journal of English Language Studies, 6(1), 15–25.

Sulistiawan, D., Hamid, A., & Nur, M. (2013). Implementation of 2013 Curriculum in Indonesian schools: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Curriculum Development, 1(2), 87–94.

Syafi’i, I. (2019). Operational concepts in educational research. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 20(1), 56–65.

Yuliati, S. R., & Lestari, I. (2018). Analysis of students’ higher-order thinking skills (HOTS) in solving HOTS questions in higher education. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 2(1), 33–44.

Yusniati, F. D. (2016). Reading comprehension test types and their relation to Bloom’s taxonomy. Journal of Language and Education, 4(2), 115–124.

Downloads

Published

28-08-2025

How to Cite

ANALISIS TINGKAT KOGNITIF PADA ITEM TES MEMBACA BERDASARKAN KURIKULUM 2013 DAN KURIKULUM MERDEKA. (2025). Cangkal : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 1(1), 94-99. https://batuahjurnal.my.id/index.php/cjish/article/view/37