ANALISIS KEKUATAN MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) SEBAGAI PERJANJIAN PENDAHULUAN DALAM HUKUM PERDATA INDONESIA

Authors

  • Noor Azizah Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari Author
  • Iwan Riswandie Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari Author
  • Istiana Heriani Universitas Islam Kalimantan Muhammad Arsyad Al Banjari Author

Keywords:

Memorandum of Understanding, Preliminary agreement, Civil law

Abstract

The use of Memorandums of Understanding (MoUs) as initial agreements or contractual stages is growing in Indonesia, but their legal status remains valid. This research aims to examine the position of MoUs in Indonesian contract law, focusing on several valid agreement requirements as stated in Article 1320 of the Civil Code and the court's interpretation of MoUs in law enforcement. This research applies a normative approach in legal studies and case studies. The results show that an MoU can be legally binding if it meets the valid requirements of an agreement, namely agreement, the capacity of the parties, a clear object, and a legitimate cause. Several court decisions, such as Denpasar District Court Decision No. 419/PDT.G/2012/PN.DPS, recognize MoUs as preliminary agreements that give rise to legal obligations. However, if an MoU only contains a general understanding without clear obligations, then the MoU is considered merely a moral agreement without legal consequences. This research emphasizes the importance of clarity in establishing an MoU to provide legal certainty.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, M. (2007). Hukum kontrak dan perancangan kontrak. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Amin, S. (2021). Legal position of memorandum of understanding in contract law in Indonesia. Awang Long Law Review, 3(2), 273–274.

Dora, K., & Ishwara, A. S. S. (2023). Kedudukan hukum memorandum of understanding (MoU) digital: Implikasi dan orientasi dalam perspektif hukum inklusif. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 8(3), 500.

Elissa, V., & Lohanda, C. D. (2024). Upaya hukum yang dapat dilakukan salah satu pihak apabila terdapat pihak lain yang wanprestasi terhadap perjanjian yang ditandatangani di hadapan notaris. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, 8(1), 753.

Isnoyo, J. D. (2019). Metodologi penelitian hukum: Mendapatkan kebenaran berdasarkan konsep hukum. Depok: PT Raja Grafindo Pustaka.

Jabalnur, dkk. (2024). Perjanjian di bawah tangan ditinjau dari asas pacta sunt servanda. Halu Oleo Legal Research, 6(2), 251–252.

Joni, E., & Sadi, I. M. (2021). Hukum kontrak teori dan praktik (Edisi pertama). Jakarta: Kencana.

Muhaimin. (2020). Metode penelitian hukum (Cetakan pertama). Mataram: Universitas Perss.

Munir, F. (1999). Hukum bisnis dalam teori dan praktek (Buku keempat). Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

Salim, dkk. (2007). Perancangan kontrak & memorandum of understanding (MoU). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Sanjaya, I. M. A. (2023). Akibat hukum atas pelanggaran nota kesepahaman (memorandum of understanding) dalam kontrak bisnis. Jurnal Prefensi Hukum, 4(3), 339–340.

Soekanto, S., & Mahmudji, S. (2003). Penelitian hukum normatif: Suatu tinjauan singkat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Suyanto, dkk. (2024). Aspek hukum dalam perekonomian. Lamongan: Academia Publication.

Downloads

Published

16-08-2025

How to Cite

ANALISIS KEKUATAN MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU) SEBAGAI PERJANJIAN PENDAHULUAN DALAM HUKUM PERDATA INDONESIA. (2025). Cangkal : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 1(1), 38-45. https://batuahjurnal.my.id/index.php/cjish/article/view/18