ANTARA MITOS DAN PEDAGOGI: MENGGUGAT RELEVANSI NILAI PENDIDIKAN DALAM ITIHASA DAN PURANA BAGI GENERASI Z
Keywords:
Itihasa Purana Educational values Pedagogy Generation ZAbstract
This study aims to examine the relevance of educational values in Hindu literature, particularly Itihasa and Purana, for Generation Z in the digital era. The study is motivated by the low level of understanding among young people toward the values contained in classical Hindu texts, which are often considered less relevant to modern life. This research uses a qualitative approach with a library research method, supported by hermeneutic, educational axiology, and critical pedagogy approaches. Data were collected through document study and analyzed using content analysis and hermeneutic interpretation. The findings show that Itihasa and Purana contain important educational values such as dharma, satya, ahimsa, and bhakti, which are relevant for character building. However, Generation Z tends to see these texts as myths due to conventional and less contextual teaching methods. Therefore, hermeneutic reinterpretation and contextual pedagogy are needed to make these values more understandable and relevant to young people’s lives. This study confirms that the relevance of Itihasa and Purana depends on how the texts are interpreted and taught in educational practices.
Downloads
References
Ardana, I. K. (2021). Model Pembelajaran Kontekstual dalam Pendidikan Agama Hindu. Denpasar: Pustaka Bali.
Bruner, J. (1990). Acts of Meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Doniger, W. (2009). The Hindus: An Alternative History. New York: Penguin Books.
Eliade, M. (1963). Myth and Reality. New York: Harper & Row.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and Method. New York: Seabury Press.
Lickona, T. (1991). Educating for Character: How Our Schools Can Teach Respect and Responsibility. New York: Bantam Books.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Nucci, L., & Narvaez, D. (2008). Handbook of Moral and Character Education. New York: Routledge.
Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.
Putra, I. G. N. (2020). Relevansi Ajaran Itihasa dalam Pendidikan Karakter Generasi Muda Hindu. Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Hindu, 12(2), 115–128.
Radhakrishnan, S. (1953). The Principal Upanishads. London: George Allen & Unwin.
Ryan, M.-L. (2004). Narrative Across Media: The Languages of Storytelling. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
Segal, R. A. (2004). Myth: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sudarsana, I. K. (2016). Penerapan Nilai-Nilai Pendidikan Agama Hindu dalam Pembelajaran Berbasis Kearifan Lokal. Jurnal Penelitian Agama Hindu, 8(1), 45–58.
Sudarsana, I. K. (2018). Inovasi Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Hindu di Era Digital. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Hindu, 10(2), 101–112.
Suhardana, K. M. (2019). Minat Generasi Muda terhadap Sastra Hindu Klasik. Jurnal Kajian Hindu, 7(1), 23–35.
Tapscott, D. (2009). Grown Up Digital: How the Net Generation is Changing Your World. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Titib, I. M. (2003). Teologi dan Simbol-Simbol dalam Agama Hindu. Surabaya: Paramita.
Wiana, I. K. (2015). Pemanfaatan Media Digital dalam Pendidikan Agama Hindu. Jurnal Komunikasi Hindu, 6(2), 89–102.
